Comfrey Root: good for back pain, arthritis, and ankle sprains: research point to.

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

Note:  Should be used topically only!!!.  Orally has shown some mutagenic properties with a chemical in it, pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA).

Some manufacturers claim their topical creams are PA free.

 

Comfrey RootComfrey Root has been used for a long time for wounds and sprains/strains. Recently research has been done to show effectiveness.

There are several alternatives to normal pain medicine for relief.  Bromalain is also a very good anti-inflammatory.  Herbs can have less side effects than medication, but they do have possible issues.  They can interact with certain drugs and certain people can be allergic to comfrey root.

Herbs should be used under supervision of an educated healthcare practitioner and you should inform your primary care physician of all herbs/supplements because of possible interactions with medications.

Some people  do not want to discuss alternative treatments they are doing with their primary physician because they might think they would get lectured or thought of differently.  More and more research is showing benefits to ‘main stream’ medicine and your doctor most likely is embracing this.

From

http://www.chiroaccess.com/Articles/Comfrey-Root–Evidence-Based-Safety-and-Effectiveness.aspx?id=0000306

Comfrey root has been used for centuries in the treatment of wounds and sprains and strains (1).  Yet, in spite of common usage, Medline did not index a clinical trial relating to comfrey until 2001 (2)  .  Since then 6 additional trials have been published which provide valuable evidence relating to the safety and effectiveness for several conditions which are common in chiropractic practice (3-8) .

Possibly the greatest obstacle to the wide spread use of comfrey is the concern over the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) in comfrey root which have demonstrated hepatotoxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic properties in oral preparations (9).  For this reason only topical preparations are considered safe.  Some manufacturers claim their product is PA free (9;10).

Back Pain:  The effectiveness of comfrey root extract was recently demonstrated in a double blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) with 120 subjects over 5 days for acute upper and lower back pain.  The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) on active movement.  Included in the secondary outcome measures were the VAS during rest.  The treatment group experienced a 95.2% decrease in pain while the placebo group experienced a 37.8% decrease in pain.  Dosage of comfrey root ointment was 4 grams of ointment 3 times per day.  The authors concluded the results were “clear cut and consistent” and reported improvement began within 1 hour of application (4).  An earlier RCT of 215 patients compared a 10% comfrey ointment to a 1% ointment.  Pain on motion, rest and palpation was significantly improved in the 10% cohort for upper and lower muscular back pain.  Tolerability of the comfrey was good to excellent in all patients (7).

Osteoarthritis:  In 2007 another RCT investigated the effectiveness of a comfrey root ointment in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis over a period of 3 weeks.  This study enrolled 220 subjects with an average age of 57.9 years.  Dosage in this trial was 2 grams 3 times per day.  In this study the VAS dropped 54.7% in the treatment group and 10.7% in the placebo group.  Statistical significance was achieved (p<.001).  Additionally statistically significant improvements were noted in quality of life, mobility, and physician and patient assessment.  There were no adverse reactions reported (5).

Ankle Sprain:  Three separate studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of comfrey root ointment in the treatment of acute ankle sprains.  In one observational study 492 questionnaires were returned from patients with ankle sprains and their physicians.  Overall 45-47% improvement in pain and tenderness was observed (3).  Two other RCTs with 162 and 142 patients respectively found comfrey root to be superior to the placebo in 1 study (6) and equal in effectiveness to Diclofenic gel in the other (8).  Of interest in the Diclofenac study was the author observation that comfrey root may actually be superior based on primary and secondary variables.

It should be noted that many of the clinical trials referenced above were funded by product manufacturers.  The physician should be alert to possible bias in these studies as a result.

Note:  These mini-reviews are designed as updates and direct the reader to the full text of current research.  The abstracts presented here are no substitute for reading and critically reviewing the full text of the original research.  Where permitted we will direct the reader to that full text.

Buddy Walk

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

 

Come Join us if you can for the 2011 Buddy Walk supporting the National Down Syndrome Society.  We will be there if it is raining or sunny.

 

Thanks

 

Walk Details: Eastern PA Down Syndrome Center Buddy Walk

Walk Date:
Sep 24, 2011
Walk Time:
2:00 PM
Walk Name:
Address
Valley Preferred Cycling Center 1151 Mosser Road
City:
Breiningsville
State:
PA
Zip Code
18031
Country
United States
Organizer Name
Bobby Lanyon
E-Mail:
Phone
570 951 9861
Website

Research: Cervical adjustment decreases elbow pain

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

A recent research article published in the peer-reviewed journal JMPT,  helps show what chiropractors and others have been saying and seeing for years; that both structural changes in one area can effect  areas above and below and neurological changes (changes in nerve firing)  effects different areas.  In this study, patients that had outside elbow pain had a significant decrease in measurable pain to touch with their neck adjusted (cervical manipulation) with also decrease in mid back adjustment (thoracic manipulation) but not as much as the neck.  Basic anatomy shows that the nerves sending signals of pain (and others) go into the spinal cord at the cervical region (neck).  This study is showing that if there is a restriction at the neck this can effect the nerves entering from the elbow and by removing that restriction (and irritation to the nerve where it enters)  that you can have decreased pain at the elbow.

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 34, Issue 7 , Pages 432-440, September 2011

Examination of Motor and Hypoalgesic Effects of Cervical vs Thoracic Spine Manipulation in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Clinical Trial

 

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a cervical vs thoracic spine manipulation on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pain-free grip strength in patients with lateral epicondylalgia (LE).

Methods

A single-blind randomized clinical trial was completed with 18 participants with LE. Each subject attended 1 experimental session. Participants were randomized to receive either a cervical or thoracic spine manipulation. Pressure pain threshold over the lateral epicondyle of both elbows pain-free grip strength on the affected arm and maximum grip force on the unaffected side were assessed preintervention and 5 minutes postintervention by an examiner blind to group assignment. A 3-way analysis of variance with time and side as within-subject variable and intervention as between-subject variable was used to evaluate changes in PPT and pain-free grip.

Results

The analysis of variance detected a significant interaction between group and time (F = 31.7, P < .000) for PPT levels. Post hoc testing revealed that the cervical spine manipulation produced a greater increase of PPT in both sides compared with thoracic spine manipulation (P < .001). For pain-free grip strength, no interaction between group and time (F = .66, P = .42) existed.

Conclusions

Cervical spine manipulation produced greater changes in PPT than thoracic spine manipulation in patients with LE. No differences between groups were identified for pain-free grip. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to further examine the effects of manipulation on mechanisms of pain and motor control in upper extremity conditions.

Back Pack Safety

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011

Many of you have heard the term back pack safety but do you know how your child should be using their backpack? Aches and pains, injuries and even potential future problems in young children can often be attributed to the incorrect use of back packs.

“In a recent survey by the American Academy of Orthopedics, 71% felt that backpacks are a clinical problem for children and 58% of the doctors reported seeing youngsters whose back and shoulder pains could be attributed to carrying backpacks that were too heavy for them.”

Tips for back pack safety

  • · Children should carry no more than 5-10% of their body weight (adults up to 15%)
  • · Keep the heaviest items closest to the back
  • · Distribute the load evenly from left to right
  • · Use both shoulder straps
  • · Strengthen the lower back and abdominal muscles
  • · Use the waist strap if the bag has one
  • · Adjust backpack so the bottom of the bag is about 1-2 inches above waist

What To Look For In a Backpack

  • · Wide, heavily padded shoulder straps that are easy to adjust
  • · Waist straps to keep the backpack fitting close to the body
  • · Separate compartments to help distribute the load evenly
  • · Try it on for comfort to see how it feels

My Child Has Back Pain, Now What?

If the pain is gone by Monday morning, this is a good sign the backpack was causing the problem.  Follow guidelines given in this article.

Heavy backpacks can cause postural distortions in your child’s spine that may cause pain or lead to pain in the future.  Have your child evaluated by a chiropractor to check for scoliosis or any other structural problems.

Whether your child has back pain or not, an ill-fitting or incorrectly worn backpack can cause stress on the body that may not show up for years.

 

 

Work Related Injuries, Recurring Low Back Pain, Chronic Care and Chiropractic Treatment

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

From  http://www.uschirodirectory.com

Based upon the Joint Report to the Governor (2009) and the statistics rendered by Cifuentes et al. (2011), the savings with chiropractic care utilized exclusive from medicine and physical therapy ranges from $1,759,942,556 with physical therapy to $3,983,027,890 with medicine. Understanding that most medical physicians utilize physical therapy as a primary tool for back related pain, we will average the savings to $2,871,485,223 by utilizing chiropractic care.

Cifuentes et. al (2011) started by stating, “Given chiropractors are proponents of health maintenance care…patients with work related Low back pain who are treated by chiropractors would have a lower risk of recurrent disability because that specific approach would be used (p. 396). They concluded by stating, ” After controlling for demographic factors and multiple severity indicators, patients suffering nonspecific work-related LBP who received health services mostly or only from a chiropractor had a lower risk of recurrent disability than the risk of any other provider type (Cifuentes et. al, 2011, p. 404).

Work Related Injuries, Recurring Low Back Pain, Chronic Care and Chiropractic Treatment:

A Proven Solution to Save Federal, State and Private Insurers $2,871,485,223

Workers Compensation Boards, public and private insurers and governmental agencies who assume the risk of the injured have an underutilized avenue to save billions. It is called chiropractic care.

In difficult economic times, politics and special interests are driving the cost of healthcare upwards to maintain the status quo. I urge you to share this will your local, state and federal elected officials so that we can contain healthcare costs, lower insurance premiums and lower our taxes. A more cost effective solution to one of the most common symptoms seen in a doctor’s office will end up saving you money.

To learn more, click on the link below or copy and paste to your Web browser.

Click below or copy:

http://www.uschirodirectory.com/index.php/chiropractic-research/item/305-work-related-injuries-recurring-low-back-pain-chronic-care-and-chiropractic-treatment-a-proven-solution-to-save-federal-state-and-private-insurers-2871485223-

This research is offered as a community service

from our office.

Low Back Pain: Research showing benefit for continued chiropractic care

Thursday, August 11th, 2011


In the following abstract from a renowned peer reviewed medical journal, it shows benefit in pain level with continued chiropractic care.

The frequency of continued chiropractic care can be different for different people and we work to help lengthen the time with home exercises and advise.

We do strongly suggest continued care with our patients.  Ultimately this is the patient's choice and we gladly see patients for flair ups.  With continued care, patients show less pain, less flair ups or re-aggravations and less time to return back to normal with any aggravations.

Please, email us or visit our website @ www.completechirocenter.com for more information.

Spine:
15 August 2011 – Volume 36 – Issue 18 – p 1427–1437
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5dfe0

Does Maintained Spinal Manipulation Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Result in Better Long-Term Outcome?

Senna, Mohammed K. MD; Machaly, Shereen A. MD

Abstract

Study Design. A prospective single blinded placebo controlled study was conducted.

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP) and to determine the effectiveness of maintenance SMT in long-term reduction of pain and disability levels associated with chronic low back conditions after an initial phase of treatments.

Summary of Background Data. SMT is a common treatment option for LBP. Numerous clinical trials have attempted to evaluate its effectiveness for different subgroups of acute and chronic LBP but the efficacy of maintenance SMT in chronic nonspecific LBP has not been studied.

Methods. Sixty patients, with chronic, nonspecific LBP lasting at least 6 months, were randomized to receive either (1) 12 treatments of sham SMT over a 1-month period, (2) 12 treatments, consisting of SMT over a 1-month period, but no treatments for the subsequent 9 months, or (3) 12 treatments over a 1-month period, along with “maintenance spinal manipulation” every 2 weeks for the following 9 months. To determine any difference among therapies, we measured pain and disability scores, generic health status, and back-specific patient satisfaction at baseline and at 1-, 4-, 7-, and 10-month intervals.

Results. Patients in second and third groups experienced significantly lower pain and disability scores than first group at the end of 1-month period (P = 0.0027 and 0.0029, respectively). However, only the third group that was given spinal manipulations (SM) during the follow-up period showed more improvement in pain and disability scores at the 10-month evaluation. In the nonmaintained SMT group, however, the mean pain and disability scores returned back near to their pretreatment level.

Conclusion. SMT is effective for the treatment of chronic nonspecific LBP. To obtain long-term benefit, this study suggests maintenance SM after the initial intensive manipulative therapy.

An Adjustment In Your Golf Game

Wednesday, August 10th, 2011

Chiropractic care is standard for many pro golfers and increasingly for many Senior Golfers as well. Professional golfer Lori West attributes the reason she’s playing today to chiropractic. Nearly two decades ago, she began visiting a chiropractor for pain in her shoulders and neck. According to West, the care has infinitely improved her golf game.

The problem is that the golf swing, in and of itself, isn’t conducive to having a healthy back. To have a good swing you create tension in your spine. (This enables you to get good distance). The tension comes from the hips stopping and the shoulders continuing to rotate. Basically, you make a coil. You’re uncoiling when you start your downswing. Since that’s an awkward movement for your back, many golfers end up with lower back problems.

Here’s some chiropractic advice.

• Before your game, do some basic stretches. Stretch out hamstrings and groin area.

• Put a club across your shoulders and lean left and right.

• Get in a position of where you would be in a swing and bend left and right.

• Grab a club behind your back and raise it up, stretching your shoulder muscles.

• Grab the club backwards – so if you normally swing right-handed, you’d grab it like you’d be swinging left-handed- and take 10 practice swings that way. You’re stretching different muscles and it will help you loosen up considerably.

• Do neck stretches. Stiff neck muscles inhibit the rest of the body from turning freely.

Anything that helps your flexibility eventually helps with your game. As you get older, your swing naturally shortens since the muscles aren’t as supple. During the winter, work on stretching the muscles of the arms, shoulders and back. Flexibility is very important for older golfers.

Also, you have to have good balance if you want to hit the golf ball consistently. A healthy spine is paramount to proper balance and posture. Improve your balance and you’ll improve your consistency. In needed, orthotic stabilizers for your shoes can help improve balance so your swing is better.

Chiropractors care for your body as a whole, not just the back. So if your golf game is feeling out of sync, chiropractic may be just the very adjustment that your body and game needs!

Chiropractic Care During Pregnancy

Monday, July 25th, 2011

The American Pregnancy Association recommends chiropractic care during pregnancy.

Please visit their website for more information

http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancyhealth/chiropracticcare.html

or please contact me if you have any questions on pregnancy and chiropractic.

Headaches & Migraine: Chiropractic vs. Medication

Friday, July 22nd, 2011

from USDirectory.com

Headaches & Migraine: Chiropractic vs. Medication

Effectiveness & Safety

In randomized clinical trials, chiropractic was 57% more effective in the reduction of headaches and migraines than drug therapy

By Mark Studin DC, FASBE(C), DAPM, DAAMLP

It was reported in October of 2010 by Wrong Diagnosis that approximately 1 in 6,16.54% or 45 million Americans get headaches yearly, with many people suffering daily. While the statistical numbers vary based upon your source of information, it can be agreed upon that headaches are very common and shared among Americans at an epidemic rate. Taking into account that a single pill for many Americans to treat a headache can cost as much as $43, according to Consumer Reports Health Best Buy Drugs, the overall cost to our economy totals billions of dollars and we need to focus not on the treatment of the effects, but the root of the cause.

When you suffer from headaches, it affects every facet of your life and you search for immediate answers. Most often it is a medication, either over-the-counter or prescription as evidenced by the amount of money spent as previously reported. One of the first medications recognized for the potential treatment of headaches is amatriptyline, commonly known by brand names such as Elavil, Endep or Amitrol as reported by Robert on About.com in 2006. It is also used as an antidepressant. This medication has made up a large part of the billion dollar industry along with over-the counter-medications. Although in many instances, this drug is indicated, the question that arises is what are the risks of taking this widely used medication?

The potential side effects of this medication targeted for headache sufferers, according to drugs.com (n.d.), are: blurred vision, change in sexual desire or ability, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, drowsiness; dry mouth, headache, loss of appetite, nausea, tiredness, trouble sleeping, and weakness. Severe allergic reactions can be: rash, hives, itching, difficulty breathing, tightness in the chest, swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue, chest pain, confusion, dark urine, delusions, difficulty speaking or swallowing, fainting, fast or irregular heartbeat, fever, chills, or sore throat; hallucinations, new or worsening agitation, anxiety, panic attacks, aggressiveness, impulsiveness, irritability, hostility, exaggerated feeling of well-being, restlessness, or inability to sit still, numbness or tingling in an arm or leg, one-sided weakness, seizures, severe or persistent dizziness or headache, severe or persistent trouble sleeping, slurred speech, suicidal thoughts or actions, tremor, trouble urinating, uncontrolled muscle movements (such as in the face, tongue, arms or legs), unusual bleeding or bruising, unusual or severe mental or mood changes, vision problems, and yellowing of the skin or eyes. Over the counter remedies of NSAID’s or aspirin have a long list of their own of side effects.

The safety of chiropractic, in spite of rhetoric from naysayers, has been documented in clinical trials by Miller and Benfield (2008), who reported on children younger under 3 years old, “the youngest and most vulnerable population…” (p. 420). There was one reaction reports for every 749 adjustments which was typically crying. None were reported to have any serious side effects.

In adults, clinically, the majority of any side effects are soreness that is transient. This is based upon this author’s 30 years of clinical experience and teaching doctors of chiropractic who are trained in creating an accurate diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan. To say that more serious side effects cannot happen is irresponsible. However, they are rare, non-life threatening and usually transient in nature, no different than infants. To ensure the best outcomes, like with any professional, you have to verify the doctor’s credentials and experience, which is best accomplished by securing a copy of the doctor’s curriculum vitae (his/her academic and professional credentials).

Nelson et. al. (1998) reported on randomized clinical trials that took place over an 8-week course. The results showed there was minor statistical differences in outcomes for improvement during the trial period for chiropractic care, amatriptyline and over-the-counter medications for treating migraine headaches. It was also reported that there was no statistical benefit in combining therapies. However, the major factor is that in the post-treatment follow-up period, chiropractic was 57% more effective in the reduction of headaches than drug therapy.

Bryans, et. al. (2011) confirmed Nelson’s findings and reported that spinal manipulation (adjusting) is recommended for patients with episodic or chronic migraines with or without aura and patients with cervicogenic headaches. This follow-up study is not a comparison or comment on the use of drugs. It simply demonstrates that chiropractic is a viable solution for many and can save the government and private industry billions in expenditures both in health care coverage, loss of productivity and avoidance of absenteeism in industry creating a new level of cost as sequella to headaches.

Medications and other forms of invasive care are often necessary and it is critical for a trained doctor to perform an accurate history and physical and when indicated, advanced diagnostic testing (CAT scans, MRI’s, etc.) to ensure there aren’t more serious underlying complications. However, based upon the results of the research provided by Nelson et al. (1998) and Bryans et. al. (2011), it should be chiropractic first, drugs second and surgery last to render better outcomes with less potential side effects and a quicker return to productivity.

References:

1. Wrong Diagnosis. (2010, October 6). Prevalence statistics for types of headaches and migraine conditions. Health Grades Inc. Retrieved from http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/h/headache_and_migraine_conditions/prevalence-types.htm

2. Consumer Reports Health Best Buy Drugs. (n.d.). Treating migraine headaches: The triptans, Comparing effectiveness, safety, and price. Health.org. Retrieved from http://www.consumerreports.org/health/resources/pdf/best-buy-drugs/triptanFINAL.pdf

3. Robert, T. (2006, May 26). Amitriptyline: Headache and migraine drug profiles. About.com. Retrieved from http://headaches.about.com/od/medicationprofiles/a/amitriptyline.htm

4. Drugs.com. (n.d.). Amitriptyline side effects. Retrieved from http://www.drugs.com/sfx/amitriptyline-side-effects.html

5. Miller, J. E., & Benfield, K. (2008). Adverse effects of spinal manipulative therapy in children younger than 3 years: A retrospective study in a chiropractic teaching clinic. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 31(6), 419-423.

6. Nelson, C. F., Bronfort, G., Evans, R., Boline, P., Goldsmith, C., & Anderson, A. V. (1998). The efficacy of spinal manipulation, amitriptyline and the combination of both therapies for the prophylaxis of migraine headache. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, 21(8), 511-519.

7. Bryans, R., Descarreaux, M., Duranleau, M., Marcoux, H., Potter, B., Ruegg, R.,… White, E. (2011). Evidenced-based guidelines for the treatment of adults with headache. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, 34(5), 274-289.

For more information about Headache and Chiropractic, Please visit http://completechirocenter.com/blog1/conditions/headaches/ or email us @ info@CompleteChiroCenter.com

Chiropractic Saves Federal and Private Insurers $15,897,840,000 and Adds $692,160,000 in Wages to Americans

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011
PRINTED IN THE DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC June 17, 2011
Chiropractic Saves Federal and Private Insurers
$15,897,840,000 and Adds $692,160,000
in Wages to Americans
by Mark Studin DC, FASBE(C), DAAPM, DAAMLP
It was reported by Zigler in 2011 that 200,000 spinal fusion surgeries are performed each year, just in the United States alone. An equal number of microdiscectomies are performed as reported by Mayer (2006), which is considered by many to be a conservative number. Let’s consider the chiropractic impact of exposing the public to treatment that could avoid needless surgeries, using the 400,000 disc surgeries as a conservative number, not to mention how this could change the unnecessary cost to government and private insurers and lost revenue to both governmental agencies and workers from absenteeism. Allen and Garfin (2010) reported that spine-related health care expenditures totalled over $97.5 billion (2011 inflation adjusted), a 65% increase from 1997. With an aging population, this trend, based on the biomechanics of the aged, will continue.
It was reported by McMorland, Suter, Casha, du Plessis, and Hurlbert in 2010 that over 250,000 patients a year undergo elective lumbar discectomy (spinal surgery) for the treatment of low back disc issues in the United States. The researchers did a comparative randomized clinical study comparing spinal microdiscectomy (surgery) performed by neurosurgeons to non-operative manipulative treatments (chiropractic adjustments) performed by chiropractors. They compared quality of life and disabilities of the patients in the study.
The study was limited to patients with distinct one-sided lumbar disc herniations as diagnosed via MRI and had associated radicular (nerve root) symptoms. Based upon the authors’ review of available MRI studies, the patients participating in the study were all initially considered surgical candidates. Both the surgical and chiropractic groups reported no new neurological problems and had only minor post-treatment soreness. 60% of the patients who underwent chiropractic care reported a successful outcome while 40% required surgery and of those 40%, all reported successful outcomes. This study concluded that 60% of the potential surgical candidates had positive outcomes utilizing chiropractic as the alternative to surgery.
Let’s do the math. If we take the 400,000 disc surgeries (adding cervical surgeries to the equation) done each year as discussed in the opening paragraph and apply McMorland et al.’s (2010) findings that 60% of surgical candidates had successful outcomes with chiropractic as an alternative to surgery, 240,000 patients yearly could avoid needless surgery if they sought chiropractic care.
According to Sherman, Cauthen, Schoenberg, Burns, Reaven and Griffith in 2010, the 2010 inflation adjusted amount per case in Medicare dollars is $13,243.82 per patient once you take into consideration the complications, but exclude many other variables such as repeated MRI’s, myelograms, and many hospital charges. Allen and Garfin (2010), taking into account total charges, including mean hospital charges for a single level, uncomplicated, minimally invasive surgery, reported the cost to be $70,159 for all payors. They also went on to report that for 2-level disc surgeries the complication rate increased by 25% with significantly more costs.
If you consider 240,000 preventable surgeries at $70,159 per patient, that equates to $16,838,160,000 healthcare dollars that did not have to be spent. MEDSTAT, as reported by Chiropractic Lifecare of America (2009), estimated that the average cost of chiropractic care per patient per case is $3,918 (2011 inflation adjusted dollars.) If you take this amount and apply it to the 240,000 unnecessary surgeries, you have a net savings of $66,241 per patient. The net savings to the Medicare system and private insurers is $15,897,840,000.
According to Fayssoux, Goldfarb, Vaccaro, James (2010) who studied the indirect costs associated with surgery for low back pain, the average lost productivity related to absenteeism resulted in lost wages of $2,884 per patient for the first postoperative year. “The findings demonstrate the significant, though not surprising, impact of spinal disability on productivity, and the importance of including measurement of lost productivity and return to work…” (Fayssoux et al., 2010, p. 9). This equals an additional $692,160,000 in wages to Americans per year by taking the necessity of absenteeism out of the equation with no surgeries to recover from.
Chiropractic offers solutions to the federal government, local government, and public and private insurance companies by avoiding unnecessary surgeries. Chiropractic offers solutions to the economy of local, state and federal governments by increasing the tax base and productivity in the marketplace as a result of keeping workers at work and circulating money into local economies with increased paychecks at the end of the year. The research is conclusive and chiropractic has solutions to many of the economic and societal problems in the United States and worldwide.
References:
1. Zigler, J. (2002). Lumbar artificial disc surgery for chronic back pain. spine-health. Retrieved fromhttp://www.spine-health.com/treatment/artificial-disc-replacement/lumbar-artificial-disc-surgery-chronic-back-pain
2. Allen, R. T., & Garfin, S. R. (2010). The economics of minimally invasive spine surgery: The value perspective. Spine, 35(Suppl. 26), 375-382.
3. Mayer, H. M. (Ed.). (2006). Minimally invasive spine surgery: A surgical manual. Germany: Springer.
3. McMorland, G., Suter, E., Casha, S., du Plessis, S. J., & Hurlbert, R. J. (2010). Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 33(8), 576-584.
4. Sherman, J., Cauthen, J., Schoenberg, D., Burns, M., Reaven, N. L., & Griffith, S. L. (2010). Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy. The Spine Journal, 10(2), 108–116.
5. Chiropractic Lifecare of America. (2009). The MESTAT Project. Learning. Retrieved from http://www.clahealthcare.com/learning/index.html
6

. Fayssoux, R., Goldfarb, N. I., Vaccaro, A. R., & Harrop, J. (2010). Indirect costs associated with surgery for low back pain—A secondary analysis of clinical trial data. Population Health Management, 13(1), 9-13.
For more information on Chiropractic, Please visit our website Allentown Chiropractor or email us @ info@completechirocenter.com